
A protected tree, a nervous homeowner, and a council process nobody wanted to start
Khandallah, Wellington
- Service
- Arborist report and crown reduction
- Property
- 1930s home on a sloping section
- Constraint
- Protected tree, consent required
The situation
The tree was close enough to the house that limbs were touching the roof in wind, but it was protected, which meant nothing could happen without an arborist report and council consent. The homeowner had put it off for two summers because the process looked opaque and every quote assumed they already knew what they needed.
What happened
The enquiry arrived with the tree height band, access, and the fact it was protected already answered, so the arborist could tell before visiting that this was a report-first job rather than a removal. They scoped the report, explained what consent would and would not allow, and quoted the reduction separately so the homeowner could decide after the report came back.
Why it mattered
Consent came through for a crown reduction rather than removal, which was the cheaper outcome and the one the homeowner preferred once it was explained. Work was done in a single day. The point of the case study is the sequencing: the report first, the decision second, the saw last.
